In the last few days, I crawled through the huge amount of articles, posts andinternal e-mails that followed the RHAT/JBoss signing. Damned! This is prettyimpressive, the feedback is extremely positive and for most this move is simplyso natural, so obvious. In retrospect it is to me too.

Inside…

Inside the company, I have been highly impressed by the reaction of my JBossian R&Dcolleagues: at first, obviously, they have been surprised by the news (they hadbeen used to rumors and there were none here), wondered what it meant for them,for their projects, etc.  It seems for many of them this is a natural move aswell. I was expecting lots of distraction, many questions, etc. but in factthings calmed down very fast: people got it and went back to work, somerelieved and most even more motivated than ever to build the next generationmiddleware! Onward! Congratulations guys, you’ve impressed me, really.

…outside

From a PR standpoint, as a said before, the feedback was overwhelming and extremelypositive. Obviously, some articles have raised some issues or challenges theycould foresee, fair enough. Let me dig into some of those…  

Theoretical challenges

I’veclassified most of the issues in the “theoretical challenges” category. They typicallyaddress high-level strategic integration issues, market-forces, synergies, e.g“does this change the software landscape as we know it” as some articlesclaimed. I am certainly not classifying them as “theoretical” in order tomake them look futile. All of these points are very interesting and most ofthem are valid questions. No, I do classify them as “theoretical challenges“because I think there is no need to spend time factually arguing for or againstthem: nobody is right or wrong at this stage, only our combined ability toexecute will tell, down the road, if we have been successful or not. Facts willspeak for themselves, no need to spend endless cycles arguing whether the skywill be clear in 2 days, 2 weeks, 2 months or 2 years. Let us prove ourselves:we are extremely motivated to build a billion dollar company, something great.Wait and see, we are working on it. Still, I know we will succeed ;)

Interoperability/Partnerships

A second category that interested me concerned our continuing work with existingJBoss partners. While I understand that this concern was raised by some of ourpartners, let me reassure many of you.  Things are pretty clear cut on ourside: maintaining a multi-vendor JEMS stack is key to our strategy. WEwill support all our partners that adopt JEMS as they infrastructure. Itwouldn’t make sense for JEMS to strictly target the RHAT Linux platform as muchas it would not make sense for RHAT to strictly target JEMS as its middleware. JBossruns on Windows and Websphere runs on Linux RHEL.  In the “real world”enterprise IT Operating systems and middleware, are heterogeneous environments.Customers demand freedom of choice, that is not something we can be for or against.It just is, by popular demand.  

FUD

A third category, the FUD one, was to be expected. I’ve surprised by the lack ofcreativity though:

• “JBoss is being licensed under the GPL, hence, obviously!, not suitable to yourenvironment, you should really use <whatever shameless product plug here>instead”
  • JBoss AS is LGPL licensed and is totally fine for your deployments, either as an end-customer, an OEM or anISV.
• “JBossis “weak” in Europe”
  • False:most of our leads come from Europe. JBoss adoption in EU is as widespread as inthe US, this is a global phenomena.
  • While it is true that in terms of company development, JBoss Europe is about one-yearbehind JBoss US, today, most of our R&D work is done in Europe.
  • Wehave developers present in 10 European countries: Belgium, Croatia, CzeckRepublic, France, Germany, Greece, Norway, Poland, Switzerland, UK;
  • We have physical offices in 4 European countries: Switzerland, UK, Germany and Belgium; Furthermore, once we hook up with Redhat, we will instantly scale ourcoverage of Europe.
  • I don’t necessarily like comparing Europe vs. the USA vs. Mars. In that regard, havinga tri-national French/Spanish/American CEO is pretty useful.
• “JBoss will no more be available as open source software, you should expect a freeversion for the children and a for-pay version for the adults”
  • That is the funniest FUD we have heard from our competitors.  Think about it aminute, consider the rumors and consider where we have chosen to end up.  RHATis a pure play open source, that is why we went there. If we really wanted togo proprietary don’t you think we would have gone somewhere else? No really! Wecertainly do not expect to change the current model: why changing somethingthat works great and the customers love?
  • Open Source business uses various models (support/maintenance, dual licensing,packaging, certification, proprietary plugins, etc.), so do we.
  • People have spread FUD for all our history on us going proprietary and we willcontinue to prove this simply wrong. That is not what we want and that is notwhat our users want.
• “JBoss will only be available on RHAT Linux”
  • See above, also the LGPL license prevents anyone from restricting our distribution.Finally remember that JBoss is written in Java and that Java runs anywhere.

What’s next?

Good question! A small combined team is currently working on the RHAT/JBossintegration plans that we will roll-out once the deal closes: We will be readyto disclose more information at JBoss World Las Vegas (don’t forget to registerin time, that’s pretty soon!). But more importantly, the team is working hardto work on future releases of our JEMS. The technology innovation rate is goingto increase: JBoss Web (Native IO and .Net/Java/PHP integration), JBoss AS 5.0(EE5/EJB3 – next generation enterprise development), JBoss ESB 1.0, SEAM (smoothEJB3/JSF/BPM integration), JBoss MicroContainer (JEMS’s new MiddlewareOperating System), JBoss Messaging 1.x (next generation messaging infrastructure)and much more! so stay tuned and enjoy!

Onward!

                                      Sacha

Bookmark/Search this post with:
| | | | | | | |